My wife will kill me for writing this one, but here it goes:
There’s a huge movement sweeping across the country known as “the tiny house movement” or “micro living”, or whatever else you want to call it. Basically, people are moving away from large expensive homes in favor of smaller more economical and ecological homesteads. In order to do this, obviously, some sacrifices need to be made, but one thing that I’ve come to notice that is a little unsettling (and in my opinion would slow down the trend) is that a good portion of the “case studies” for smaller living are of either single people or couples with no children.
[editor’s note: this is simply my observation thus far. anyone out there with children living in a home smaller than 1000 sf, please comment with photos of your home.]
When I design a “small” home, I always design with my family in mind: husband, wife, two kids (three on the weekends). My wife will say that our current home (coming in at 1200 sf) is no where near enough, but then our home wasn’t designed or built for 21st century living [we own a 1918 Craftsman Bungalow currently in various states of renovation]. Our home was built before the automobile was widely used, before television, before central heat and air (for residences). Life was much different 92 years ago. Changes are obviously in the works to maximize the use of our 1200 sf, but that’s a story for another time. Even with such a modest home, we waste a great deal of space simply because of the nature of how it was designed – segregated spaces and separate functions.
The logistics of housing 4 or 5 people may seem like a daunting task and you may think that this would muscle out the idea of “micro” living, but you would be wrong. It’s all in the way you perceive things and how imaginative you can get with how spaces function.
For instance, do you really need a dedicated living room, dining room and kitchen? Probably not. Even for a family of 4, providing a generous kitchen with seating at an island is sufficient for every day use and reduces the overall square footage needed for each function. Living spaces can also be reduced in size by the careful and thoughtful placement/use of built-ins. With the advent of wireless technology, flat screen tv’s and compact discs, virtually all of your media needs can be stored in a very small amount of space. A dedicated media built-in need only be about 12″-18″ deep, depending on the type of equipment you have, and can be designed to have multiple functions such as entertaining, reading, romper room – basically any public function.
Through careful design and efficient use of space, as well as taking a cold hard look at what is really necessary for residential living, a family of 4 could comfortably live in a home of no more than 800-1000 sf. Think NYC/London hyper-urban living in the suburbs.
Oh, how glorious it would be to build a sub urban neighborhood with a density closer to an urban center, but still supplying green spaces, access to mass transit and easy connections to necessary services like shopping, groceries, schools, hospitals and leisure all without sacrificing privacy.
Reading this post and my other post, why a custom residence is better, will hopefully make you think twice next time you drive through some big box sub urban neighborhood to drop $200k+ on a house that has 1000 sf that you really don’t need. And then go find an architect or designer who is passionate about his profession and wants to design a home for you that fits you and won’t waste space or your money. There’s a better alternative, you just have to look for it.